I don't agree, I mean you pointing your journalist to what you think it
relevant.
You didn't respond to the questions I raised. I think the matter is more
complicated than just saying the discussion is free. I was asking whether
such a discussion can be printed out, passed on incoherently,
inchronologically, out of context? Van it, amnd why should it, and what for?
Amd how do the other particpants feel?
greetings
Johannes