
It's wrong to assume that small video clips are the only options for 
dance on the web. I've created three web dances myself, and am working on 
another at the moment, and only one of these uses video. The web is a new 
medium. It has different possibilities and different limitations. The 
error that many people make is to simply view it as a resource for 
delivering material created in/for another medium - print/video/audioCD 
etc. The possibilities are new and we are only just scratching the 
surface. 
A couple of examples:
Bandwidth creates many problems but also possibilities - using the 
tension it can engender is one example possibility. Bandwidth limitations 
also push designers in a direction which choreographers are uniquly 
experienced to exploit - much less bandwidth is required to move an 
object on a web page than is required to replace it with another object, 
so choreographing movement is a very useful skill. The problem with video 
on the web is that it replaces each frame of the video with a new frame, 
rather than just moving the objects contained in the frame.
And what of the audience. The browser software itself sets up 
expectations due to the visual and interactive structure within which a 
site is displayed. And consider that most people viewing a web dance are 
alone, seated at a desk, and maybe surfing when they should be working. A 
situation very different from a theatre or television audience. And a 
situation that must be considered when creating the work.
And of course interactivity. Interactivity is not essential to a web 
dance, but it is one of the interesting possibilities we have for 
experimenting with.
A century ago, film existed but none of the possibilities you mention for 
it had been realised yet. Now the medium is understood and we accept that 
dance on film is a reasonable idea. Don't dismiss dance on the web just 
because we haven't discovered, explored and understood the possibilities 
yet.
Richard
-------------------------------------------------
 Richard Lord          richard@bigroom.co.uk
 Big Room              http://www.bigroom.co.uk/
 Web dances: http://www.bigroom.co.uk/edances/
-------------------------------------------------
>I would like to pose a question:  Why dance on the web?
>
>Dance on video makes sense - OK so there are some elements that don't work
>so well on video, but there are equally a wealth of new possibilities
>opened up by special effects, camera angles, focus, etc.  A sort of
>sideways slipage of the field of possibilities.  But why the Web?  Dance
>on the Web must necessarily be presented as video clips, so there are no
>new opportunities in terms of form and content.  Infact the field of
>possibilities has shrunk - literally - because of downloading times and
>tiny video frames on screen.
>
>The reasons which I have come up with are:
>1.  global communication 
>2.  mass availability for minimum charge (free if you are lucky enough!)
>3.  interactive possibilities (which is where my field of research lies).
>
>What does anyone else think - especially those who are currently working
>with the Web?
>
>Incidentally, thanks to those who responded to my previous request for
>information on interactive dance web sites.
>
>Sita
>
>