2 or 3 sounds good. it isn't that important to me--showing the work is much
more so.
(i was planning on 3 of my own) the page will be set-up with 1-2k thumbnails
that should dl pretty fast.
the gallery's going to be organized into two pages, one of names+thumbnails,
and one of just names. artists will be conneted to galleries and to their
e-mails here at art.net, so they can get feedback from viewers.
Michael
Saelon Renkes wrote:
> Michael Betancourt wrote:
>
> > Everyone at art.net who feels censored by the new laws should be
> > included, so speak up!
>
> I'm speaking up! I'll get back to you on which images. I'll do five if
> that's what you decide on, but it seems to me that it might be more
> effective with fewer images per person as long as there are plenty of us
> participating - the diversity of work might be more quickly apparent.
> I'm just doing my usual worrying about losing the people who haven't the
> patience to wait for a huge page full of images to download. What would
> you think of 2 or 3 each?
>
> Saelon
> --
>
> Studio at Art on the Net -
> http://art.net/~saelon/