Re: Important First Amendment Case
kuntz (Jean-Jacques.Kuntz@ltm.u-nancy.fr)
Thu, 26 Mar 1998 10:50:58
A 14:05 25/03/1998 -0800, vous avez écrit :
>
>Hi fellow artists,
>
>I just received a note from Ann Beeson of the ACLU and she
>informed me that the state of New Mexico has just passed a law
>that is almost identical to the New York law we successfully
>challenged and defeated last year. This NW law is also very
>similar to Federal CDA that was overturned.
>
>The NM law, which will become effective July 1, 1998, makes it
>a crime to use the Internet to engage in any communication that
>"depicts actual or simulated nudity, sexual intercourse or any
>other sexual conduct." This language is even broader than the
>"indecency" and "harmful to minors" laws struck down in the CDA
>case and in _ALA v. Pataki_ (NY CDA Case), because there is no
>requirement that the communication be "offensive" or "lack serious
>value." So *any* nudity -- including Michelangelo's David or a
>description of sexual conduct in a medical text -- is criminal
>if communicated on the Internet and accessible in New Mexico.
>
>Here on Art on the Net (art.net), we do have artists that work
>with the nude figure and we have written works that depict sexual
>related topics (ie. in the poets section). So our site would be
>constricted by this new CDA law in New Mexico which in turn, could
>constrict the freedom of speech that artists enjoy here on art.net.
>
>The ACLU is planning on filing the challenge to the New Mexico law in
>federal court in Albuquerque next month. Because our site once again
>has a considerable content that is at risk under the law, Ann feels
>that we would be an especially valuable plaintiff for the case
>(just as we were in the NY CDA case which we won).
>
>I would like to have our site, Art on the Net (art.net) join this
>challenge as this law threatens the existance of our site. I hope
>that you will all join with me in saying "yes" to Ann's request at
>being a plaintiff to this challenge. If anyone feels otherwise,
>please let me know.
>
>And please let me know if anyone has any questions.
>
>Freedom is not "free". We have to continue to fight for it and
>protect it to keep it.
>
>thanks,
>
>-lile
>
>(a webmaster@art.net)
>Founder of Art on the Net (art.net)
>
I'm with you and with all artists from art on the net. There is no art
without freedom. No censure.
Jean-Jacques Kuntz
Peintre
tel: 03 83 28 02 15
http://www.art.net/~kuntz/home.htm